Skip to content

Author's details

Reviewer's details

Case Study: Incorporating Recovery at Work Among Medical Doctors in Sub-Saharan Africa

Introduction

Sub-Saharan Africa faces significant healthcare challenges, including a critical shortage of medical professionals, high patient-to-doctor ratios, and underfunded healthcare systems. Medical doctors in the region are often overworked, with long shifts, frequent night duties, and limited resources, all contributing to high levels of stress, fatigue, and burnout. Despite these challenges, integrating recovery practices into daily work schedules is crucial to sustaining the physical, mental, and emotional health of doctors and ensuring quality patient care.

This case study examines how a group of medical doctors in a public hospital successfully incorporated recovery at work, demonstrating the feasibility and impact of such practices in a high-demand, resource-limited environment.

Discussion
Setting: General Public Hospital, in Nigeria sub-Saharan Africa

In this 400-bed public hospital, the doctor-patient ratio is approximately 1:10,000. Doctors in the hospital typically work 12- to 16-hour shifts, often including night duties and weekend shifts. Many reports feeling fatigued, emotionally drained, and physically overworked, leading to higher risks of medical errors and a decrease in the overall quality of patient care.

Problem

The hospital’s leadership identified an alarming increase in burnout symptoms among the medical staff. Some key issues included:

  • High absenteeism and turnover rates among doctors.
  • Increased frequency of medical errors.
  • Lowered job satisfaction and mental well-being.
  • Physical exhaustion due to long hours and limited breaks.

Doctors were operating in a state of chronic stress, with very little time dedicated to physical or mental recovery with most rating 25-30 in the Kessler psychological distress scale (K10). Recognizing the need for intervention, hospital administrators decided to explore how recovery practices could be integrated into the doctors' workflow.

Intervention Strategy

The hospital leadership, in collaboration with the medical staff and wellness experts, implemented a series of interventions designed to promote recovery at work without compromising patient care. The focus was on integrating small, sustainable practices that fit within the doctors’ existing schedules.

Implementation of Microbreaks

Doctors were encouraged to take short, 5- to 10-minute breaks between patient consultations, surgeries, and administrative duties. These breaks included:

  • Stretching exercises to relieve muscle tension from standing or sitting for long periods.
  • Mindfulness or breathing exercises to reduce mental fatigue and increase focus.
  • Drinking water or having a quick snack to maintain hydration and energy levels.

To make this practical, schedules were adjusted slightly to ensure that each doctor could take multiple microbreaks during the day without disrupting patient care.

Introduction of Rest Areas

The hospital designated a room as a "recovery lounge" where doctors could rest during their breaks. The space was equipped with comfortable seating, low lighting, and a quiet environment conducive to relaxation. Doctors could use this area for naps during long shifts or engage in brief moments of meditation and mindfulness.

Peer Support Groups

A peer support program was introduced, allowing doctors to share their challenges and successes in managing work stress and recovery. This not only created a sense of community but also provided an outlet for emotional support. These groups met informally during lunch breaks or after shifts.

Healthy Eating and Hydration Initiatives

Recognizing the impact of nutrition on recovery, the hospital cafeteria began offering healthier, nutrient-dense snack options that were easy to consume during brief breaks. In addition, hydration stations were placed throughout the hospital to encourage doctors to drink water regularly.

Flexible Shift Scheduling

Although the hospital had limited staffing, minor adjustments were made to ensure that doctors had adequate rest periods between shifts. Rotations were organized so that after particularly long or demanding shifts, doctors had sufficient time off for rest and recovery.

Technology and Task Delegation

Doctors were provided with mobile medical applications to streamline patient management tasks, reducing administrative burdens and freeing up time for recovery. In addition, nurses and physician assistants were assigned more responsibilities, such as routine check-ups and patient education, allowing doctors to focus on critical cases and recover between demanding tasks.

Results

Six months after implementing these recovery strategies, the hospital observed several positive outcomes:

• Reduction in Burnout: A hospital survey found a 35% decrease in self-reported burnout symptoms among doctors. They reported feeling more energized and better equipped to handle their workload. K10 questionnaires administered to doctors revealed improved mental outcomes at K10 <25.

• Increased Job Satisfaction: Doctors reported higher job satisfaction levels, with 80% of them acknowledging that the new recovery practices helped them feel more valued and supported by hospital leadership.

• Improved Patient Care: There was a notable reduction in medical errors and patient complaints. Doctors attributed this to being more focused and alert during their shifts due to adequate recovery time.

• Lower Absenteeism: Absenteeism rates among doctors dropped by 20%, suggesting that the recovery practices contributed to improved physical and mental health.

Key Challenges

Despite these successes, several challenges were noted:

• Resource Constraints: Implementing flexible scheduling and rest areas required careful balancing with the hospital's limited staffing. Some departments, especially emergency and intensive care units, found it more difficult to incorporate recovery breaks due to the urgent nature of their work.

• Cultural Resistance: Initially, some doctors were reluctant to embrace microbreaks, fearing it might be seen as a lack of commitment to patient care. Over time, with education and leadership support, this resistance diminished.

Lessons Learned

1. Small Changes Can Make a Big Impact: Simple interventions like microbreaks, hydration, and peer support had a significant impact on doctors' well-being, proving that recovery doesn't require large-scale system overhauls.

2. Leadership Support Is Crucial: The success of these interventions was largely due to the backing of hospital management, which made recovery a priority and demonstrated a commitment to staff wellness.

3. Flexibility Is Key: Given the unpredictable nature of healthcare, especially in resource-limited settings, flexibility in scheduling and recovery practices is essential. The ability to adapt these practices to the needs of different departments and shifts was crucial to their success.

Conclusion

This case study illustrates that even in the challenging healthcare landscape of sub-Saharan Africa, it is possible to integrate recovery practices into the demanding schedules of medical doctors. By prioritizing small, sustainable changes—such as microbreaks, rest areas, and peer support—hospitals can significantly improve doctor well-being, reduce burnout, and ultimately enhance the quality of patient care. The experience at this Kenyan hospital demonstrates that recovery is not a luxury but a necessity for maintaining a healthy, productive workforce, even in high-stress environments.

 

Further readings
  1. Albulescu P, Macsinga I, Rusu A, Sulea C, Bodnaru A, Tulbure BT. ” Give me a break!” A systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of micro-breaks for increasing well-being and performance. Plos one. 2022 Aug 31;17(8):e0272460.
  2. Kim S, Park Y, Niu Q. Micro‐break activities at work to recover from daily work demands. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2017 Jan;38(1):28-44.
  3. Trougakos JP, Beal DJ, Green SG, Weiss HM. 2008. Making the break count: an episodic examination of recovery activities, emotional experiences, and positive affective displays. Acad. Manag. J. 51:131–46 [Google Scholar]
  4. Trougakos JP, Hideg I 2009. Momentary work recovery: the role of within-day work breaks. Current Perspectives on Job-Stress Recovery S Sonnentag, PL Perrewé, DC Ganster 37–84 Bingley, UK: Emerald [Google Scholar]
  5. Sonnentag S, Cheng BH, Parker SL. Recovery from work: Advancing the field toward the future. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior. 2022 Jan 21;9(1):33-60. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-091355 
  6. Steed, L. B., Swider, B. W., Keem, S., & Liu, J. T. (2021). Leaving Work at Work: A Meta-Analysis on Employee Recovery From Work. Journal of Management, 47(4), 867-897. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206319864153 
  7. Dubale, B.W., Friedman, L.E., Chemali, Z. et al. Systematic review of burnout among healthcare providers in sub-Saharan Africa. BMC Public Health 19, 1247 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7566-7
  8. Kessler RC, Barker PR, Colpe LJ, Epstein JF, Gfroerer JC, Hiripi E, Howes MJ, Normand SL, Manderscheid RW, Walters EE, Zaslavsky AM. Screening for serious mental illness in the general population. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003 Feb;60(2):184-9. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.60.2.184. PMID: 12578436.